A House Divided A House DividedDocumentation
Changelog
Player Wiki/Economy

Nationalization & National Corporations

Last updated 2026-08-21

Nationalization is the state-ownership lifecycle: a government can take a private corporation (or one of its sectors) into public hands, run it as a state-owned enterprise, and later sell it back to the market. Every country has a single central National Corporation that absorbs what the state takes over, plus optional split-offs for individual sector types.

private corp ──(nationalize: absorb)──▶  National Corporation  ──(privatize: spin out)──▶  new private corp

The two directions are inverses of one another. Nationalizing folds a target's sectors, assets, and bonds into the country's National Corporation and dissolves the original shell. Privatizing carves a new, independently named corporation back out and floats it to investors.

When the state can take a corporation#

Unowned and NPC assets can be nationalized freely. A player-owned corporation is protected: the state may only reach it when one of four conditions unlocks the target.

Trigger Condition Notice
Financial distress The CEO seat has been vacant for 72 turns, or insolvency or a defaulted bond has accumulated 72 financial-distress turns. Seized once the grace condition is complete, with no further notice.
Strategic sector The corp operates in a sector the government has designated strategic. 48 turns.
Monopoly The corp holds 75% or more of a national sector market. 48 turns.
Supermajority vote The legislature passes a taking with a two-thirds majority. 48 turns.

The notice window is counterplay. When a strategic, monopoly, or supermajority taking is filed, the target owner sees a pending notice and has those turns to respond before the taking completes. Financial-distress takings are immediate.

Each country starts with a set of default strategic sectors flavored to its economy (for example, defense and technology for the United States, financial and energy for the United Kingdom). A head of government can designate further sectors strategic through executive action or legislation.

Authority: who pulls the trigger#

There are two authority paths, and the path determines how much the state must pay.

Executive: fast and unilateral, available to the head of government for emergencies, but limited in reach and politically expensive when used as a seizure. Executive takings can apply discounted or token compensation.

Legislative: slow and durable. A taking enacted through a bill carries full statutory weight and is expected to pay a fair buyout. The supermajority path is a special legislative route that unlocks any target with a two-thirds vote.

Compensation tiers#

Shareholders are paid against the target's valuation, scaled by the tier the authority used.

Tier Shareholders receive Typical path
Fair Full valuation. Legislative buyout.
Discounted Half valuation. Executive emergency.
Seizure Nothing. Executive seizure (maximum political cost).

Compensation follows the world's market-system mode. Fresh worlds use plants: Fair compensation is 1.0x replacement-cost tangible book, with the Discounted and Seizure tiers applying their stated reductions. The legacy pre-plants path uses capitalized earnings and its historical 5x going-concern premium. Do not apply that 5x multiplier to plants valuation.

Investor confidence#

Every country carries an investor-confidence index from 0 to 100, healing toward a baseline of 70 a little each turn. Takings push it down: a fairly-paid buyout barely moves it, while an uncompensated seizure takes a large bite. A statist government pays less confidence for a taking; a market-liberal one pays more. Popular takings (rescuing a distressed firm, breaking up a monopoly) can even nudge public trust upward.

Confidence is not cosmetic. As it falls below baseline it feeds three real pressures:

  1. Expropriation risk drags private corporate margins (state-owned enterprises are exempt).
  2. Sovereign risk premium raises the interest rate the government pays on new debt.
  3. Founding surcharge raises the cost to incorporate a new company in that country, up to +25% at rock-bottom confidence.

Privatizing sends the opposite, pro-market signal and restores some confidence.

Operating a state-owned enterprise#

Once absorbed, sectors run under the National Corporation rather than as a sprawl of separate firms. SOE behavior is distinct from a private corp:

The finance minister (Secretary of the Treasury, Chancellor, and equivalents) manages the country's National Corporations: appointing CEOs, splitting a sector type off into its own named enterprise, and merging one back in.

For the full operating manual, covering the National Corporation page and its tabs, public-service mandates, the CEO's four operating levers, the two-actor financing model, treasury backing and remittance, dynamic efficiency, and state-ownership concentration, see the companion page on National Corporations.

Privatization#

Privatization is the inverse operation: the state carves a fraction of a sector out of the National Corporation into a brand-new corporation with its own name, then floats it by IPO or auction.

Political weight#

Nationalization is never free. Beyond investor confidence, a taking can cost regime legitimacy and government approval, scaled by how unpopular it is and by the government's ideological lean. Statist governments find takings cheaper and privatizations costlier; market-liberal governments find the reverse. Plan the politics before you plan the takeover.