A House Divided A House DividedDocumentation
Changelog
Player Wiki/Elections

Primary vs General Tactics

Last updated 2026-08-21

Primaries and generals require fundamentally different playbooks. A player who wins the primary by hitting all the party-base notes will often lose the general if they don't pivot. This page is about how and when to pivot, and what you should absolutely not change.

For phase rules see Primaries and General Elections. For tactical depth see Campaign Strategy.

The fundamental difference#

Dimension Primary General
Who votes Your party's members (and NPPs in your party) All voters in the state
How winner is chosen Highest primary score (no vote accumulation) Vote accumulation across all turns
Biggest stat lever Alignment to party platform (40 pts) Appeal via policy positioning to demographics
Strategic target Party base Swing demographics
Time pressure Fixed declaration deadline (no vote gradient) Gradient: final 4 turns weighted 30%
Cost multiplier on campaign upgrades 1.0x 1.5x
Attack rival candidates? No (same party) Carefully (opponents only)
NPP endorsements Useful, modest Useful, higher weight

What you cannot change between primary and general#

Some things are locked the moment you enter a primary. Understand this before declaring:

What you can pivot#

Ad targeting#

During primary you target your party's base demographics (groups whose lean matches your party platform). During general you target swing demographics: groups near the centre on both axes that could go either way.

If you declare in a centre-left party and won the primary by hammering Union & Trades and Public Sector, keep them. They still vote in the general. But add Secular Professionals, Soccer Moms, and (if applicable) Retirees who are ideologically accessible with the right ads.

Canvassing targeting#

Primary canvassing can be tighter (your base groups). General canvassing should broaden:

Campaign upgrade investment#

Primary is the cheap phase for campaign-page upgrades. Every ₳1 spent here is ₳1; in general it's ₳0.67 of value per dollar (1.5x cost).

Rule: Aim to have your key upgrades (Fundraising 3+, Media 2, Ground Game 2, Opposition Research 1-2) purchased before the primary ends.

Opposition Research target#

Primary: no Opposition Research (you're all in the same party). General: pick the leading opponent. Retarget as the race progresses if someone else becomes the threat.

Campaign intensity#

Primary: moderate. You're winning on alignment and Favorability, PI matters less than you'd think past ~40. General: ramp. PI matters heavily in the state race reach x appeal x approval x party-org formula. Push PI to 70-80 for the closing sprint.

Attack doctrine#

Primary: don't attack. Same-party attacks raise your Infamy, drain your Favorability (primary-score bucket), and even if the rival gets hit they might still beat you.

General: selective attacks: if an opponent's Favorability is 65-75 and you can drop them 5-10 points with 5-10 attack actions, that's often race-winning value. Against 80+ Favorability opponents the diminishing returns protect them. Against under-50 opponents, they're already losing, don't waste Infamy.

Presidential primary differences#

The formula itself differs from state primaries:

The implication: presidential primaries reward party influence and Favorability, not one-cycle PI bursts. State party org still matters in the general.

Presidential general#

Pivoting checklist (primary win to general)#

The moment your primary resolves:

Office-specific notes#

Office Strategic key
US House Multi-seat + 20% threshold; party organization matters for total party seat count, not individual candidacy much. Spread party ads across many districts.
US Senate Single-seat statewide. Broad demographic appeal matters. Attack the opponent's soft groups.
US Governor Office strength 1.0 means state government approval is the biggest multiplier. If approval is high in your state, you benefit more than the Senator candidate does.
US President Electoral College + state lean + party-weighted positions + swing-state travel. Very different game from state races.
UK MP (Commons) Multi-seat regional PR. Party org is decisive: a 60%-org party with middling candidates can out-seat a 40%-org party with strong candidates.
UK Prime Minister No direct election. Win via your party's Commons leader-of-largest-party position + confidence vote.
DE Bundestag Mixed-member PR: constituency win + party list. Constituency is single-seat FPTP; list is pure PR. Strategies differ.
DE Chancellor Confidence vote by Bundestag. Similar dynamic to UK PM.
JP Sangiin / Shūgiin Parallel system: prefectural FPTP seats + PR list. Candidates pick one or the other; list seats come from party performance.
JP Prime Minister Via Shūgiin leader selection. Similar parliamentary dynamic.

Common pivoting mistakes#